The Purple Party Paradox

Let’s imagine a new Canadian party. They pick purple as their colour because they are a perfect blend of red progressive human rights and blue conservative economic stability. Their platform has four pillars: cost of living relief, housing, healthcare, responsible immigration, and energy security with environmental stewardship. Each pillar balances compassion with fiscal responsibility.

Now let’s imagine that the Purple Party is second-past-the-post in each of Canada’s 343 ridings. How many seats would they win in the House of Commons? Zero. Yes, zero!

Map of Canada Public Domain/Horse Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

 Even though they won more of the popular vote, as the Conservatives did in 2019 and 2021, it could still be shut out of Parliament entirely. That's the fundamental flaw of first-past-the-post—millions of votes can result in zero representation.

Electoral reform with proportional representation would solve this unfairness. If the Purple Party won 35% of the vote, they would win 35% of the seats. Imagine knowing that your vote would count, help elect someone, never be wasted or split the vote, and make every riding matter in every election.

Unlike Canada, most OECD countries use proportional or mixed electoral systems. When votes are translated into seats, you are more likely to believe your voice matters. That belief builds trust in democracy. Trust creates a stronger sense of belonging, where you feel less ignored or shut out. A democracy you trust is more likely to stay united.

Support electoral reform with PR. Visit FairVote.ca or CharterChallenge.ca to learn how.

35% votes = 35% seats—simple math, fair representation

The Real Math of Representation

 What did you think about the unusual wave of floor crossings? In the aftermath of Conservative MP Gladu’s floor crossing, Prime Minister Mark Carney said, "If you really want to unite the country, you want people with lots of different views." This applies most clearly to elections, when diversity within a party is built transparently. After elections, when diversity is gained through defections, it can raise questions about legitimacy.

When someone crosses the floor, it blurs the connection between how people voted and who governs. That dynamic is sharper under first-past-the-post, where even a small shift can have outsized effects on power. This strengthens the case for proportional representation (PR), where seats reflect how people actually voted. Similar shifts would be less likely to dramatically alter who governs because power is usually shared among multiple parties and coalition agreements.

Image created by ChatGPT 9-Jun-2026

While majority governments elected with less than majority support may “get things done,” the policy lurch that follows can undo those gains and create uncertainty. GPC Leader Elizabeth May points instead to Lester B. Pearson’s minority governments, which worked closely with Tommy Douglas and the NDP to help deliver Medicare, the Canada Pension Plan, and major expansions of social programs.

Canadians cast ballots for representation, not surprises. PR would make sure the democratic math still adds up after election day.

Support electoral reform with PR. Visit FairVote.ca or CharterChallenge.ca to learn how.

35% votes = 35% seats—simple math, fair representation

Vote and Voice

At an elementary school event, I witnessed a great example of nurturing parenting. The parent announced it was time to go. One child protested and pleaded. The parent listened attentively and responded to the child’s words while playfully herding their two children to the door. The parent’s listening was not a surrender of authority, but a way of guiding the child through frustration. Nurturing parenting often means giving a child a voice, but not a vote.

Our first-past-the-post electoral system offers an opposite example. Even when your vote helps elect an MP, that MP often has no voice. As Andrew Coyne explains in The Crisis in Canadian Democracy, MPs historically used their voices to “consider, refine and pass” legislation. Increasingly, they are whipped by party discipline (and/or personal ambition) to keep their party in power. Omnibus bills and truncated debate times further muzzle our MPs, reducing Parliamentary voting to a rubber stamp.

Proportional representation (PR) would change this dynamic. Coyne also explains how PR governments promote stable, consensus-based policy. Those consensus-based policies are because MPs have a voice. Also, because the votes a party gets translates into seats, voters have a voice.

Image by Clker-Free-Vector-Images and OpenClipart-Vectors from Pixabay.

Which raises a timely question: if PR converts votes into voices—both in Parliament and across the country—would Alberta be holding a referendum on leaving Canada at all?

Support electoral reform with PR. Visit FairVote.ca or CharterChallenge.ca to learn how.

35% votes = 35% seats—simple math, fair representation

From "Can AI?" to "Should AI?"

If you had asked me five years ago if my instructional design work could be done by artificial intelligence, (AI), I would have said no. Now, I would say yes. The question has changed from can AI replace human workers to, should it?

The recent federal budget cuts the federal public service by adopting AI tools. Imagine at 65, you defer your OAS benefits because you are still working. Then your checks start arriving. Your local Service Canada is closed. The automated phone menu is a maze. Your online My Service Canada Account is equally confusing. You give up trapped between AI systems with no human help.

Image by Alicia from Pixabay

Giving up has financial implications for you as OAS benefits are taxable. However, the larger harm is psychological. Being at the mercy of AI algorithms is likely to produce stress and alienation, undermining your wellbeing and civic trust.

Canada needs long-term AI policies that keep pace with technology and protect humans. But under first-past-the-post (FPTP), parties chase short-term wins, ignoring future consequences. Even if the current government implements good policies, the next government may change it to align with their politics.

To harness AI safely and for the common good, we need policies that prioritize humans and lasting solutions. Electoral reform with proportional representation (PR) fosters collaboration and consensus, encouraging long-term policymaking that benefits everyone. Support electoral reform with PR. Visit FairVote.ca or CharterChallenge.ca to learn how.

Full Dose Democracy

 Do we live in a democracy or a plutocracy? In End Times, Peter Turchin defines democracy as government “shaped by the collective will of common citizens” and plutocracy as government shaped by economic elites. The Pharmacare issue offers a revealing case study.

For decades, the majority of Canadians have wanted universal pharmacare as prescription drugs have eaten up a growing slice of health spending. Last year, the federal government passed the Pharmacare Act. At first glance, that looks like democracy in action. But is it?

Our collective will was for universal pharmacare covering everyone, regardless of income or private insurance. This model, recommended by the government’s own 2019 Advisory Council and four previous reports, would give Ottawa real power to negotiate lower prices and save billions. It’s a prescription for healthier finances and healthier citizens.

Yet Big Pharma resisted universal coverage because it threatened profits. They pushed for gap pharmacare, which preserves fragmented plans, high prices, and complex bureaucracy that confuses patients. Under gap coverage, the government lacks power to negotiate or unify drug policies. Turchin notes that in a plutocracy, the elite always get their way. Our case study is evidence we live in a plutocracy.

🄯 N Carswell

If we want policies shaped by people, we must strengthen our democracy. Adopting a proportional representation (PR) election system would dilute elite influence, boost accountability, and help deliver public priorities like universal pharmacare rather than watered-down, profit-protecting alternatives. PR is real reform, not a placebo. Learn more at FairVote.ca and/or CharterChallenge.ca. 

Review of the NFB Documentary "A Losing Game"

 TLDR

Québec’s political system favours the powerful and sidelines diverse voices—much like in Saskatchewan. This revealing video exposes how Québec falls short on fair representation, media access, and electoral reform. A must-watch for anyone questioning the state of democracy in Canada.

Directed by Jenny Cartwright - 2025 | 97 min

Summary

The critique of politics in Québec highlights a deeply entrenched imbalance in its democratic system. While nearly all adults can vote, real political power remains concentrated in the hands of a privileged few. Reforms in political party financing have disproportionately hurt minor parties, as public subsidies now depend heavily on previous election results, ignoring abstention and rejected ballots. This means that even those who do not vote still contribute financially to dominant parties, perpetuating their power.

Québec’s first-past-the-post electoral system is central to this inequity. Despite being simple to use, it produces distorted results, often awarding majority governments that do not reflect the popular vote. Since 1867, only five parties have held power, marginalizing new voices and ideas. Promises of electoral reform have repeatedly been broken, most recently by François Legault’s government.

Minor parties and marginalized communities—racialized people, women, youth, the disabled, and working-class citizens—remain underrepresented, not due to a lack of interest, but because systemic barriers and media exclusion prevent their visibility. The media, which prioritizes ratings over representation, favors major parties and sensational coverage over substantive debate.

The political system reinforces a cycle where established elites maintain control, silencing alternative visions and contributing to public disengagement. Voter turnout suffers, yet abstentions still fuel the very system many protest. In this context, the lack of meaningful diversity in the National Assembly leads to out-of-touch governance, where policies often fail to address lived realities. Ultimately, Québec’s democracy, as it stands, fails to reflect its people.

Windigo Thinking

First, my apologies to Darrens who know how to share. Robin Wall Kimmerer tells of a stand in her community where gardeners shared excess produce. Someone stole the stand, ending the sharing. She named the thief Darren comparing him to Darren Woods, CEO of ExxonMobil, who takes more than he needs. In 2024, Woods’ pay was $44.1 million—equal to 801 Canadians’ annual earnings.

Modified image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

Kimmerer’s Potawatomi culture teaches about the monster Windigo “who suffers from the illness of taking too much and sharing too little.” “Windigo thinking jeopardizes the survival of the community by incentivizing individual accumulation far beyond the satisfaction of ‘enoughness.’” Produce Stand Darren and Profit First Darren are Windigo thinkers.

How many Darrens with Windigo thinking did we elect to our House of Commons? The cost of entering the race suggests many. Darrens must give up paychecks and have an employer willing to grant leave. Then they need Darren-like donors (who benefit from tax credits). How can we reform our system so Darrens don’t dominate?

Proportional representation (PR) produces more diversity because it allocates seats by vote share. This leads to legislatures that better reflect our identities and perspectives. While there are Darrens in the legislature, there are also Alices, Benjamins, Chen, Deepa, Ethans… In 2025, Saskatchewan elected 13 Caseys and 1 Lane. With PR, we’d have elected 9 Caseys, 3 Lanes, and 1 Nicky or benefited from more diversity without strategic voting.

Support electoral reform with PR. Visit FairVote.ca or CharterChallenge.ca to learn how.

Democracy Needs More Women in the Room

 The documentary Pray the Devil Back to Hell chronicles how Liberian women used nonviolent protest to end 14 years of civil war. After pressuring the male president and male rebels into peace talks, they blocked the exits when negotiations stalled, forcing the men to stay until an agreement was reached. Having endured years of restriction, often without basic necessities, the women wanted the men in the room to taste that same hardship. 

Screengrab from Pray the Devil Back to Hell

What the documentary does not show are the countless hours the women spent after each protest, reflecting and strategizing. One organizer reflected, “If we had not had different women from different walks of life banding together, we may not have been able to solve the problem.” At its core, democracy exists to address the problems of its people. It flourishes when diverse voices are heard, and inclusive decision-making fosters policies that are both equitable and responsive to all.

Countries with proportional representation (PR) elect more women to the legislature, bringing a shift in legislative priorities. Research shows that women in government are more likely to champion policies that support education, healthcare, family well-being, and social equity. They also prioritize collaboration and long-term solutions over partisan conflict. With more women in the room, diverse problem-solving approaches lead to stronger, more equitable policies—this is, in essence, real democracy.

This federal election, ask you candidates if they support electoral reform with proportional representation. Visit FairVote.ca and/or CharterChallenge.ca to learn more.

Rising Billionaires and Receding Democracy

Have you lived a billion seconds? Hint: You’ve lived a million seconds if you are 12 days old. If you’ve lived a billion seconds, you are almost 32.

Now, imagine if dollars were seconds and your lifetime earnings were $2.2 million. How many days is that? About 26 days. But billionaires? They’ve got 32 years' worth of dollars to burn. They only need to spend 12 days' worth to flood election campaigns with donations, channel lobbyists into key positions, and submerge politicians in a tide of influence. With just a 0.00094 of their fortune, they shape policies, cut themselves tax breaks, and rig the system in their favor.

Under first-past-the-post (FPTP), winning isn’t about representing the most people; it’s about gaming the system. A party can win total control with just 39% of the vote, leaving the majority without a voice. And who benefits? The ultra-rich.

Modified mage by Alex Yomare from Pixabay

Proportional representation (PR) is a remedy. PR ensures seats match votes, making it harder for wealthy donors to buy governments. More diverse voices in the legislature mean fewer policies to benefit the wealthy and more policies that serve people and the planet.

If you’re tired of a democracy that prioritizes profit over people and our planet, support PR. It’s time to reclaim our democracy for everyone. With electoral reform through PR, we can take the next step—transforming our economy from a linear system of extraction and exploitation to a circular one centered on sustainability and justice. Visit FairVote.ca and/or CharterChallenge.ca.

Quality of Democracy Envy

  Do you distinguish between jealousy and envy? I do. Jealousy is wanting something someone else has and not wanting them to have it. Envy, on the other hand, is wanting something someone else has while being fine with them having it too.

I envy the quality of democracy in Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland. These countries, among others, use proportional representation (PR) to elect their national legislatures. PR ensures political parties win seats based on the percentage of votes they receive. This system encourages people to vote because they know their vote truly counts. In Canada, a dispiriting 50% votes elect no one; in Belgium, it’s less than 5%.

PR systems lead to higher voter turnout (especially among younger people), more diverse representation (in terms of age, gender, and occupation), and greater voter satisfaction. With more women in legislatures and a structure that encourages cooperation over competition, PR fosters collaboration. This leads to thoughtful, long-term legislation that builds voter trust. Greater trust, in turn, leads to increased civic engagement—a key indicator of a healthy democracy.

As the Saskatchewan election approaches, ask your candidates if they support electoral reform with PR. If they don’t, ask how they plan to improve civic engagement and the quality of our democracy. Share your conversations with facebook.com/FairVoteSask and learn more at FairVote.ca.

Success Promoting PR at Saskatoon Pride

 At our Saskatoon Pride booth, we drew inspiration from a Fair Vote Canada session that used Lego to illustrate the math behind first-past-the-post (FPTP) and proportional representation (PR). The speaker's dramatic gesture of sweeping wasted votes into a garbage can had a profound impact on me. Could I replicate this visceral experience for voters? Absolutely!

I prepared two garbage containers labeled “Winners” and “Wasted” and brought my Tile Rummy game. We asked visitors, “Did the candidate you voted for in the last provincial or federal election win?” (Emphasizing that we were not interested in the candidate or the party.) Those who answered “Yes, my candidate won,” picked a black tile and tossed it into the Winners bucket. Those who answered “No,” picked a colored tile and tossed it into the Wasted bucket. Many of the “No” respondents shared my sense of the unfairness of wasted votes.

Next, we compared the number of tiles in each bucket. This comparison often led to a “Really?” moment for both “No” and “Yes” voters. Even though we clarified that our sample at Pride was not representative of the general electorate, many were surprised by the outcome. If our tiles represented an election, 10 voters would have picked the winner, while 79 votes would have been wasted.

FPTP Wasted Votes 79 to Winner Votes 10

A big thanks to volunteers Lynn and Sherry for personing our booth. We had lively conversations throughout the day with people who asked questions and people who responded to our questions. When things finally quieted down, I thought I could relax and have supper, but I was delighted to put my food aside as more questions came in.

Fair Vote Canada Saskatchewan Chapter at Saskatoon Pride

I’m pleased to report that more people are becoming aware of electoral reform and proportional representation. Let’s celebrate our progress!

Mature Politics with Proportional Representation

Decades ago, one of my children visited Saskatchewan’s Legislative Assembly. Expecting to learn about governance and democracy, they were instead appalled by chaos and incivility. Elected officials, who were supposed to represent us with dignity, behaved like squabbling children.

Image by Dmitry Abramov from Pixabay

Recent sessions amplify the worst tantrums of past decades. MLA Ken Francis confessed he gets sucked into trash talk almost daily. Speaker Randy Weekes’ final speech alleged threats and harassment from fellow Saskatchewan Party MLAs. He also alleged Deputy Leader Jeremy Harrison brought a gun into the Assembly.

Premier Scott Moe’s response? Weekes is a “sorer loser” and Moe dismisses the alarming allegations against Harrison as false. No investigation necessary. He also categorizes the texts to Weekes as “ambitious” rather than “harassment.” Ambitious? To what purpose? Partisan purposes as the sender attempts to have the non-partisan speaker favour a side?

The first-past-the-post produced Assembly fosters an environment where yelling and intimidation mock dialogue and collaboration. Reform with proportional representation could address these issues. By ensuring that legislative seats more accurately reflect the diverse views of our population, evidence proves proportional representation encourages coalition-building and cooperation. Instead of a winner-takes-all approach that fuels partisanship, this system promotes a more inclusive and respectful political culture.

Proportional representation offers a path to a more mature and effective legislative process. To improve our democracy in provincial and federal elections, vote for candidates who will enact electoral reform with proportional representation. Learn more at FairVote.ca or facebook.com/FairVoteSask.

Escaping Our Groundhog Day Campaigning Loop

Are you familiar with the movie Groundhog Day? Phil Connors, the main character, realizes that he is trapped in a time loop. It feels like Canadians are stuck in a political version of Groundhog Day with our first-past-the-post (FPTP) electoral system.

Modified image from Clker-Free-Vector-Images/nathallie_art/Katie White from Pixabay.

FPTP’s permanent campaign loop has become our political alarm clock, waking us up each day to the same hollow promises and slogans. This endless cycle interferes with effective governance. Our leaders are so busy perfecting their campaign smiles that they forget about the real issues – it's like they're stuck in a time loop, determined to look good to maintain or gain power.

How does permanent campaigning disrupt effective governance? It diverts those in power from long-term comprehensive inclusive policy planning to short-term narrow selfish electoral gains. It encourages politicians to prioritize image over substance, neglect complex issues, and fosters a polarized environment. Politicians direct resources towards winning elections rather than securing social justice and environmental stewardship.

The solution? Let's break free from this political Groundhog Day with electoral reform, specifically through proportional representation (PR). It would inject vital variety into our political landscape, ensure that diverse voices are heard, and prevent the same old script from playing on repeat. It's time to ditch the permanent campaign loop of FPTP. Let’s embrace the collaboration of PR that numerous democracies use to produce effective and visionary governance.

Support FairVote.ca, NationalCitizensAssembly.ca, and CharterChallenge.ca and ask your MP to vote for M-86 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform.

By Nancy Carswell

Our Shared Ecosystem Credit Card

 Are you familiar with layaway plans? Layaway plans are payment by installments and you take possession of the merchandise after you have paid in full. An advantage of layaway over buying on credit is you don’t pay interest. (Not paying interest is good because making only minimum payments, I would pay $38,000 in interest on my latest bill.)

Are fossil fuel-based industries on a layaway plan or are they using a credit card? While their extraction is payment by installments—infrastructure, equipment, and labour, they are charging gigantic sums on our shared ecosystem credit card.

Modified image by Alistair Whyte from Pixabay

Ecosystems are circular. Withdrawing elements like water unbalances the cycle. One example is the Alberta tar sands tailing ponds’ water. Recycling the 1.2 trillion litres of toxic water to rebalance the ecosystem will absorb 50% of the estimated $130 billion total clean up. Less than $2 billion has been secured from industry.

Government issues industry our shared ecosystem credit card. It sets environmental limits and charges interest. Sadly, our first-past-the-post electoral system does not support diversity. Our representatives are mostly wealthy lawyers and executives who prioritize the economy over the environment. Their wealth insulates against environmental devastation. To keep Earth habitable for humans, we need diverse representatives, some who comprehend we depend on balanced circular ecosystems and prioritize the environment over the economy. We need electoral reform with proportional representation (PR). Support FairVote.ca, NationalCitizensAssembly.ca, and/or CharterChallenge.ca. Also, mention to your elected representatives that countries that have evolved to PR get better environmental report cards.

By Nancy Carswell

Cost of Keeping First-Past-the-Post Electoral System

 Are you loath to upgrade to a new cell phone? I was and I regret it. My new cell has upgraded my life. This may sound exaggerated but it is not. My new cell’s space allows for audiobook downloads. Listening to them turns joyless boring chores into joyful interesting experiences. Its software supports a fitness app and its feedback inspires more steps and more sleep.

Image by Bruno from Pixabay

It is impossible to calculate the cost of keeping my old cell. What is possible to calculate is the years Canadians have been cheated out of an upgraded democracy. Before 1921, Canadian elections were between two parties. The 1921 election had three. This made our majoritarian electoral system of first-past-the-post (FPTP) undemocratic. Winning a seat no longer required a majority of votes. As the number of parties increased, our democracy decreased. In the 2021 federal election, the Conservatives won more votes but with FPTP the Liberals won 160 seats to the Conservatives 119. The Bloc won 32 seats with 8% of the vote compared to the NDP’s 25 seats with 18% of the vote. Not upgrading our democracy has cost us over a hundred years of distorted election results.

Since 1921, commissions, reports, politicians, and citizens have consistently and repeatedly recommended electoral reform with proportional representation (PR). Parties have promised it (and reneged after getting 100% of the power with FPTP). Other countries using FPTP have upgraded their democracy with PR. It is time we did the same. Support FairVote.ca, NationalCitizensAssembly.ca, and/or CharterChallenge.ca.

By Nancy Carswell

Stability and Harmony

 

"PICTURE IT" #7 STABILITY AND HARMONY: CANADA WITH PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION 

Picture it— Canada 2016. There is no need for a third all-party committee on electoral reform nor do the Liberals break Canadian hearts when they break their promise of electoral reform. There is no need because 1921 was the last election using the undemocratic, unfair, first-past-the-post system. Since 1925, our proportional representation system has promoted stability for harmony inside and outside Canada.

The last 100 years has seen the United Kingdom's policies lurching from left to right. In recent decades, the Conservative Party wins a majority and policy lurches to the right. Then the Labour Party wins a majority and policy lurches to the left. Meanwhile, in Canada, proportional representation minimizes policy lurch. Because the distribution of votes between parties is relatively stable election to election, the proportion of power between parties is stable. Parties collaborate with each other to produce thoughtful, long-term legislation. During elections, parties focus on honouring and winning voters, not humiliating and beating opponents.

Elections in Canada have high voter turnouts and between elections there is high civic participation. Rather than negative protesting, citizens find positive ways of engaging with their representatives. One of these was a national citizens assembly on peace. A Nobel Peace Prize winning outcome was that the government must prove to Canadians that it has exhausted all non-violent alternatives to war. 

Like other countries with proportional representation, Canada enjoys human security. Human security is a product of our political stability and diversity, social justice and safety nets, and environmental stewardship. However, Canada is aware that no one is safe until all are safe. It is leading a global security initiative based in nonviolent action which the Canadian military has embraced.

Canadian voters trust proportional representation to secure stability and harmony because it fosters stability and harmony within the political process.

If you wish this picture were true, help make it true. Support electoral reform with proportional representation. 

Environmental Stewardship

"PICTURE IT" #6 ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP: CANADA WITH PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

Picture it— Canada 2015. There is no need for Justin Trudeau and Liberal candidates to promise electoral reform 1,813 times during the election campaign. There is no need because 1921 was the last election using the undemocratic, unfair, first-past-the-post system. Since 1925, our proportional representation system has ensured that our environmental policies are determined by scientific evidence, not political ideology.

After the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was established in 1988, Canada used it to guide our response to climate change. We consistently meet and exceed our Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement greenhouse gas reduction targets. This is largely due to the active youth vote that prioritizes planetary care over corporate profit.

We experienced a fair and just transition to renewable energy unlike the United States. It fell prey to climate change denial lobbying powered by a coalition of well-funded fossil fuel companies and industry groups. Canada's basic annual income supported fossil fuel workers as they retrained for jobs in the renewable energy sector. Canada is currently a world leader in renewable energy innovation and usage.

Canada immediately signed the "4 per 1000" initiative and committed to implementing its regenerative agriculture strategy to mitigate climate change and increase food security. Regenerative agriculture not only sequesters carbon dioxide reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but it increases soil health while creating sustainable incomes.

Canadian voters trust proportional representation to secure environmental stewardship through social justice.

If you wish this picture were true, help make it true. Support electoral reform with proportional representation.

View the video at #6 Environmental Stewardship.

Strong Economy

 "PICTURE IT" #5 Strong Economy: CANADA WITH PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

Picture it— Canada 2005. There is no need for a report on electoral reform to the House of Commons because 1921 was the last election using the undemocratic, unfair, first-past-the-post system. Since 1925, our proportional representation system has been a positive economic force in our lives.

With proportional representation, Canada has enjoyed a balanced and inclusive economic policy framework for decades including a national energy policy. Our electoral system ensures our fiscal and economic policy is strongly rooted in the economic and social realities experienced by Canadians. Our policy does not lurch from right to left as it does in winner-take-all systems. Progress is made on issues like labour relations, corporate regulation, poverty reduction, and tax reform. Progress that is inclusive, informed, and long term. Progress that is good for business, labour, and the environment. And like other countries using proportional representation, Canada enjoys stronger economic growth than countries using plurality-majority electoral systems.

Canadian voters trust proportional representation to ensure that strong budget, trade, fiscal, and tax policies serve all of us.

If you wish this picture were true, help make it true. Support electoral reform with proportional representation.

View the video at #5 Strong Economy.

Social Trust

 "PICTURE IT" #4 SOCIAL TRUST: CANADA WITH PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

Picture it— Canada 2004. There is no need for the independent Law Commission of Canada to conduct a three-year study on electoral reform and recommend proportional representation. There is no need because 1921 was the last election using the undemocratic, unfair, first-past-the-post system. Like other countries using proportional representation, Canada ranks high for income equality and other indicators of well-being.

Canadians enjoy a host of benefits linked to income equality. The benefits include higher life satisfaction, better physical and mental health, better social mobility, fewer children in poverty, fewer teenage pregnancies, less crime, and less incarceration. Central to all these is a sense of trust that is commonly low in winner-take-all electoral systems. People in more equal societies trust each other more. Trust leads to goodwill, compassion, and connectedness. These in turn lead to more community involvement and civic participation. Community involvement and civic participation generates more trust creating a virtuous cycle.

Canadian voters trust proportional representation to distribute power fairly so no one income group has power over the others.

If you wish this picture were true, help make it true. Support electoral reform with proportional representation.

View the video at #4 Social Trust.

Healthier Citizens

 "PICTURE IT" #3 HEALTHIER CITIZENS: CANADA WITH PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

Picture it— Canada 1979. There is no need for a task force on national unity nor does Pierre Trudeau, Stephen Harper, or Ed Broadbent make arguments for proportional representation. There is no need because 1921 was the last election using the undemocratic, unfair, first-past-the-post system. Canada's proportional representation system has proven to be more responsive to the diverse health needs of our population.

Like other countries using proportional representation, Canadian's life expectancy increased, and its infant mortality decreased. Because Canada could plan the use of its resources democratically, Medicare was established and then expanded to Dentalcare. When over 90% of the voters wanted Pharmacare, their elected representatives delivered. Pharmacare's bulk buying made prescriptions affordable. This reduced costly medical interventions downstream while freeing up resources for effective prevention upstream.

When corporations lobbied to privatize Canada's world-renowned Connaught Medical Research Laboratories, it was nationalized instead. [insulin, diphtheria, heparin, tetanus, typhus, blood processing, penicillin, polio, smallpox] Connaught continues its cutting-edge research, is profitable, and produces many generic drugs used by the Pharmacare program. In a pandemic, Connaught stands ready, willing, and able to produce profit free vaccines for Canadians in Canada.

Canadians trust proportional representation to allocate resources democratically, ensuring a healthier population.

If you wish this picture were true, help make it true. Support electoral reform with proportional representation.

View the video at #3 Healthier Citizens